Here’s an excerpt from our Blog Post dated January 2, 2015. Lastly, at some point, our government and the macro-business community needs to realize that depending on others, particularly China, a devious business partner at best and a self-avowed U.S. foe, is a not only a shortsighted business strategy, but one that has much broader national security implications as well. Again, hearkening back to our WWII lessons, having an ever-ready, flexible, and potent manufacturing infrastructure at hand meant the difference between victory and defeat. That is no less a potential consideration in today’s rapidly deteriorating socio-political world climate.
Unfortunately, our admonition of 5 years ago is proving accurate. Clearly, going forward this offshore-derived Covid 19 pandemic demonstrates the material risk in relying on other countries, particularly the forever-adversarial China.
We will likely overcome what we presume is a serious, but temporary, health and economic disaster that may take 12 to 24 months to run its course. During this time, it is incumbent on both our government and corporate businesses to onshore all vital manufacturing processes and products. There’s nothing being produced today in the Asian-based region that wasn’t first created, invented, and made in the USA. Such a fundamentally sound move will restore a great deal of US prosperity and, decidedly, bolster US security on several fronts.
While traditionalists lament the apparent decline of our domestic manufacturing capabilities in today’s global environment, a recently-released Brookings study found that our overall output standing has not changed precipitously since 1970. True, we have fallen to second behind China in total output, but, interestingly, they absorbed the most-labor intensive processes to grow their capabilities. This is evidenced by their 2015 20% global market share requiring a reported 129 million workers at a time when our U.S. 18 % share employed a much more efficient 16 million, down from 1970’s all-time highs of about 20 million jobs.
A national economic strategy should be to cherry-pick back the most attractive jobs that were likely offshored over the past several years which would also help regain the top spot in output. The Trump presidency has shown more interest in reclaiming the manufacturing sector than the prior administration that saw job growth largely occur in the governmental and service sectors.
Clearly, the U.S. has invented, grown and retained the most technically efficient manufacturing processes and industries in the world. In many ways, China is at a point where the U.S. was decades ago. Going forward, it’s important that we protect our most valuable U.S. intellectual property. Equally important is our U.S. cultivation of entrepreneurs and tech-savvy small businesses to further grow tomorrow’s manufacturing innovations . This will ensure our continued dominance on the world productivity stage, and give us added protection in a rapidly confrontational international world of nations.