Category Archives: Strategic Planning

FRB Main street loans

The Federal Reserve Bank of Boston has launched their Cares Act-related Main Street Loan programs. These 95% FRB guaranteed facilities are aimed at higher-end small and mid-sized businesses that were performing well before the Covid 19 economic disaster. Certain non-profit organizations are also eligible. They are available through participating banks. Not all banks have signed up at the time of this post.

Most businesses will vie for the “New” or “Priority” loan options that start at $250 thousand ranging to $35 million or $50 million. These are five year floating rate term loans. The interest rate is either one or three month LIBOR plus 3.00%. At this week’s current rates, that would create an interest rate slightly below 3.25%. Interest payments are deferred for the first year and principal payments are deferred for the first two years. Full loan amortization occurs during years three through five.

Eligibility is tied to a borrower’s 2019 EBITDA. From the two loan types above, the borrowing amount is either 4X’s 2019 EBITDA less existing loan amounts and unused credit lines or 6X’s. The remaining amount calculated must exceed the $250 thousand threshold. There is no loan “forgiveness” associated with these loans. Essentially, these Main Street Loans are targeted toward larger, more profitable companies than the earlier Paycheck Protection (PPP) and Economic Injury (EIDL) business loans and grants of the U.S. Treasury and SBA. For more information, visit https://www.bostonfed.org/supervision-and-regulation/supervision/special-facilities/main-street-lending-program/information-for-borrowers.aspx

Made IN AMERICA – 2.0

It’s both amazing and disheartening to see the politicizing of a Covid 19 pandemic that has rocked the USA and the world. Too many politicians place getting elected above problem-solving from what amounts to serious bio-medical warfare, intentional or otherwise . Clearly, too, they’ve shifted the more important attention away from the real culprit in this ordeal. Their immediate focus should be on assuring that another pandemic is not on the horizon. Nor should stated adversaries be allowed to finance their nefarious strategies through business wealth that we have negotiated away over the years.

It is difficult to fathom the nonchalance and outright belligerence of the Chinese government. Not only do the Chinese discount any claim of responsibility, but they continue to attack on many different fronts ranging from regional territorial grabs, to human rights, to intellectual property thefts and espionage. Oh, and hoarding medical grade masks and other PPE.

Critical American manufacturers, including pharmaceutical companies, should immediately onshore every product made there. Any other company that is involved in a defense-capable or critical technology industry-related venture should be required to produce here if they choose to remain a USA-domiciled corporation. National security and patriotism isn’t an option. A case can be made that the U.S. Defense Dept. should play a bigger role in deciding what goods and services are allowed to be made abroad.

Free traders forget fair trade. Nothing is fair about the current imbalance with China. At a minimum, they have outflanked our government trade negotiators. They only take enough non-strategic goods to satisfy our modest export quotas, like agriculture products and cars, while reverse engineering all of the more valuable and critical technology we allow there. And try and get these Chinese government-owned companies to export their valuable resources, like the rare earth minerals that are vital to much of today’s technology. All in all, American companies that export technologies or manufacturing processes that threaten our way of life, health and national security need to be brought back home. And that return would also provide both capital and opportunity for our entrepreneurs and small businesses.

The old mantra of free markets and global trade is just that…old. The U.S. must restore a legacy of controlling its own destiny and ability to guard against any and all threats domestically and around the world if it effects American interests. That’s not to say we need to be the sole 1960’s Cold War Era world cop. What’s required is overwhelming domestic-made defense materiel capability and enough deployment flexibility to smother any attempt by rogue countries to sponsor violence and terrorism as they see fit. Another long overdue initiative is to prevail on so-called allies, most notably the French, Germans and Swiss that allow their military and companies to continue to arm and aid many of the most despicable worldwide terrorist groups and regimes.

Many investor and shareholder- beholden U.S. companies will complain about cost disadvantages of bringing home our manufacturing prowess. They forget the fact, as we’ve noted in earlier posts, that virtually every good or service made in a Far East country came from here originally or was copied or taught by U.S. providers after WW II. They ignore the reality that this economic transfer has significantly eroded a good share of middle class wealth. True, cheap imports lessen the supply-side cost of buying a good or service, but lesser wages paid in replacement alternative jobs, similarly lessens what consumers can buy. Consumption ability counts at least as much as supply and it behooves the U.S. to regain a bigger share of worldwide production. Not a good net/net trade-off that sends a healthy chunk of our economic output elsewhere. Who would have guessed that a formerly poor, largely agrarian economy like China would now have more billionaires than the U.S. in the space of 25 years or so. And possess state of the art technology and manufacturing production that we largely “gifted” away.

This loss of manufacturing and technology capacity to overseas providers exacerbates the other major deflator to future U.S. economic growth. The brilliance of technology on all fronts has more than halved the number of people and mid to high wage jobs needed to perform a wide variety of functions and tasks. This one-two punch of offshoring wealth and settling for more modest wages has to be addressed and reversed. When you combine preserving the prosperity of the American way of life with critical national defense and the peaceful protection of people around the world, why would you choose to do otherwise?

Need 2016 Q1 Consulting?

Consulting
Consulting

As Q1 2016 comes to a close in a few weeks, is your small or mid-sized business on track to achieve or exceed your strategic goals? Are there particular metrics that don’t measure up?

Are you driving revenues as expected with decent margins? Are you gaining profitable customers? Is cost control your only salvation to date? Are any new initiatives working?

Do you have links to your subsidiary functional plans that align so that your entire business is hitting on all cylinders? Is your communication process good at getting specific expectations to those colleagues that need to perform? Does everyone have “walking around” understanding of goals and objectives? Do they “buy-in”? In our experience, many planning processes are either too “elegant”, cumbersome or non-specific. Plans can fail if they don’t lead employees to the correct behavior every day.

Planning Maxim

“Doing the right thing is more important than doing things right”.

An independent consulting check-up can help determine if your internal planning, budget and operational reviews have identified material issues and any corrective actions that may be required. It may also uncover other factors that may be missed or are considered off-limits or sacrosanct.

Now may be the time for a fresh set of eyes. All too often, owners and managers are great cheerleaders for their business (as expected) at the expense of simultaneously being vigilant and fierce critics. It’s important to identify and mitigate any competitive weaknesses before your competitors or customers do.

As fabled GE CEO Jack Welch reportedly once said “change before you have to”.

The end result of a consulting evaluation may assure your company’s ongoing high performance results. Western Equity will consider consultative, interim, temporary, or part time senior engagements. Please contact us regarding your requirements.